When we hear about VRF, its almost synonymous to MPLS VPN. Virtual Routing and Forwarding is
commonly used by Service Providers to provide services within an MPLS cloud with multiple customers.
The most interesting feature of this is that, VRF allows creation of multiple routing tables within a
single router. This means that overlapping use of IP addresses from different customers is possible.
Through the network setup below, we will see how to configure VRF and check if its really possible for
duplicate ip addresses.
We have 3 customers in the figure connected to a Provider Edge router.
We will name the VRF’s Blue, Red and Yellow.
Now let’s configure RD’s on the PE router.
Router(config)#host PE
PE(config)#ip vrf blue
PE(config-vrf)#rd 1:1
PE(config-vrf)#ip vrf red
PE(config-vrf)#rd 2:2
PE(config-vrf)#ip vrf yellow
PE(config-vrf)#rd 3:3
Basically the “rd” command is in the format ASN:nn or IP-address:nn. The VRF names and rd values
are actually locally significant which means that it doesn’t matter what name you create.
What really matters is the “route target” value because this is what you will import or export.
Now we have created VRF’s, lets configure interfaces and apply the VRF’s to the interfaces.
PE(config)#int fa0/0.2
PE(config-subif)#encapsulation dot1q 2
PE(config-subif)#ip vrf forwarding blue
PE(config-subif)#ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.252
PE(config-subif)#int fa0/0.3
PE(config-subif)#encapsulation dot1q 3
PE(config-subif)#ip vrf forwarding red
PE(config-subif)#ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.252
PE(config-subif)#int fa0/0.4
PE(config-subif)#encapsulation dot1q 4
PE(config-subif)#ip vrf forwarding yellow
PE(config-subif)#ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.252
If you notice above all interfaces have the same ip address which is 1.1.1.1.
Normally without VRF, the router will give a warning message that
overlapping ip addresses are not allowed.
The command “ip vrf forwarding ” will add the vrf to a specific interface.
Blue#ping 1.1.1.1
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 1.1.1.1, timeout is 2 seconds:
!!!!!
Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 8/35/80 ms
Red#ping 1.1.1.1
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 1.1.1.1, timeout is 2 seconds:
!!!!!
Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 8/48/156 ms
Yellow#ping 1.1.1.1
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 1.1.1.1, timeout is 2 seconds:
!!!!!
Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 8/60/136 ms
It’s good! We have ip reachability to PE from the CE routers. Now, from PE point of view,
how will PE know which one to ping if we use 1.1.1.2 since all Blue, Red and Yellow
routers use the same ip?
This can be accomplished using the “ping vrf ” command. See below.
PE#ping vrf blue 1.1.1.2 Type escape sequence to abort. Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 1.1.1.2, timeout is 2 seconds: !!!!! Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 4/28/68 ms PE#ping vrf red 1.1.1.2 Type escape sequence to abort. Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 1.1.1.2, timeout is 2 seconds: !!!!! Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 4/28/88 ms PE#ping vrf yellow 1.1.1.2 Type escape sequence to abort. Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 1.1.1.2, timeout is 2 seconds: !!!!! Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 8/31/68 msNow, we have proven that duplicate IP addresses is possible using VRF. Be reminded that VRF’s are
usually and by standard configured on PE routers. CE routers normally don’t make use of VRF’s but
there are always exceptionsTo make this work you do require a switch between the PE and the CE Routers.
You must set the Switch port mode for the PE Router-to-Switch to dot1q (i.e trunk) and the
Switch port mode for each CE Router-to-Swith to access with the respective vlan
(i.e blue=2,red=3, yellow=4).Hope that helps!
Comments
(There are currently no comments for this post.)